بررسی روابط پلیوتروپیک ویتلوژنین در شبکه پاسخ به تنش زنبور عسل با استفاده از رویکرد تحلیل شبکه (PPI)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه جیرفت، جیرفت، ایرن.

2 موسسه تحقیقات علوم دامی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران.

چکیده

هدف: زنبور عسل (Apis mellifera) به‌عنوان گرده‌افشان کلیدی، نقشی حیاتی در حفظ تنوع زیستی و امنیت غذایی دارد اما در دهه‌های اخیر با چالش‌های محیطی از جمله تنش‌های گرمایی و اکسیداتیو مواجه شده است. پاسخ مولکولی زنبور عسل به این تنش‌ها فرایندی چندلایه است که شبکه‌های پیچیده‌ای از پروتئین‌ها را در بر می‌گیرد. هدف از این پژوهش، تحلیل شبکه تعامل پروتئین-پروتئین (PPI) برای شناسایی گره‌های کلیدی و الگوهای سازمان‌یابی عملکردی در پاسخ به تنش، با تمرکز بر نقش پلیوتروپیک ویتلوژنین(Vg) بود.
روش پژوهش: با استفاده از پایگاه داده STRING، شبکه‌ای متشکل از ۲۵ ژن کاندید مرتبط با دفاع آنتی‌اکسیدانی، پاسخ به شوک حرارتی، ایمنی ذاتی و تنظیم متابولیک-هورمونی ساخته و در نرم‌افزار Cytoscape مصورسازی و تحلیل شد. ماژول‌های عملکردی شبکه با افزونه MCODE شناسایی و شاخص‌های مرکزیت (Degree، Betweenness، Closeness  و (Eigenvector با افزونه CytoNCA محاسبه شدند. همچنین، تحلیل غنی‌سازی فرایندهای زیستی و کارکردهای مولکولی Gene Ontology و نیز مسیرهای KEGG و Reactome با استفاده از پایگاه داده STRING انجام گرفت.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که این شبکه ساختاری منسجم دارد که در آن ژن‌های Sod1، Trx-2 و Sod2 با بالاترین درجه اتصال(Degree=16) به‌عنوان هاب‌های اصلی شناسایی شدند و نقش محوری در دفاع آنتی‌اکسیدانی ایفا می‌کنند. تحلیل مرکزیت شبکه نشان داد که Vg با بالاترین مقدارBetweenness centrality   به‌عنوان مهمترین گره واسط عمل می‌کند و ماژول‌های عملکردی مجزا را به یکدیگر پیوند می‌زند. واکاوی زیرشبکه القاشده درجه‌اول متمرکز برVg  ارتباط مستقیم این پروتئین با ۱۱ همسایه عملکردی در حوزه‌های دفاع آنتی‌اکسیدانی، ایمنی ذاتی و مسیرهای متابولیک-هورمونی را آشکار ساخت. تحلیل غنی‌سازی عملکردی در پایگاه‌های Gene Ontology، KEGG و Reactome برجستگی فرایندهای مرتبط با پاسخ به تنش اکسیداتیو، تنظیم متابولیسم و ایمنی ذاتی را تأیید کرد.
نتیجه‌گیری: این یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهند که پاسخ به تنش در زنبور عسل بر تعامل چهار محور اصلی دفاع آنتی‌اکسیدانی، پاسخ حرارتی، ایمنی و تنظیم متابولیک استوار است و Vg به‌عنوان هماهنگ‌کننده میانماژولی این سامانه‌ها عمل میکند. شناسایی این شبکه یکپارچه و گره‌های هاب می‌تواند به معرفی نشانگرهای مولکولی کاندید برای بهبود تحمل تنش و افزایش بقای کلنی‌های زنبور عسل در برنامه‌های اصلاح نژادی کمک کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Pleiotropic Role of Vitellogenin in the Honey Bee Stress Response Network: A Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) Network Analysis

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zahra Roudbari 1
  • Azadeh Torabi 2
1 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jiroft,,Jiroft,Iran.
2 Animal science research institute of Iran (ASRI), Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction
The honey bee (Apis mellifera) is a cornerstone of global biodiversity and agricultural stability, serving as a primary pollinator for a vast array of crops. However, the survival and productivity of honey bee colonies are increasingly threatened by escalating environmental challenges, most notably thermal stress and oxidative pressure. These stressors trigger complex molecular responses that aim to maintain cellular homeostasis and prevent damage to proteins and membranes. Rather than acting through isolated, independent genes, the honey bee’s physiological resilience is orchestrated by an intricate, multi-layered network of interacting proteins. A key player in this molecular landscape is vitellogenin (Vg). Historically categorized primarily as a yolk precursor protein, Vg has recently been recognized as a highly pleiotropic molecule that regulates several critical physiological processes, including immunity, longevity, metabolic homeostasis, and redox balance. Given its widespread involvement in diverse biological functions, Vg is hypothesized to act as a central integrator within the stress response network. However, the precise network-level role of Vg and its interactions with key antioxidant and immune-related proteins have not been comprehensively mapped. This study was designed to bridge this knowledge gap by employing a systems biology approach, specifically protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis, to elucidate the structural and functional architecture of the honey bee stress response and to characterize the topological role of Vg as a potential network mediator.
Method
To construct a representative model of the honey bee stress response, a curated dataset of twenty-five candidate genes was selected based on an extensive review of existing literature, ensuring comprehensive coverage of four fundamental physiological axes: antioxidant defense (e.g., superoxide dismutases), heat-shock response (chaperones), innate immunity (antimicrobial peptides), and metabolic-hormonal regulation (signaling pathways). Subsequently, the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed using the STRING database (version 12.0), applying high-confidence interaction thresholds to minimize false-positive links and ensure the reliability of the derived interactome. The resulting network was then visualized and analyzed with Cytoscape (version 3.10.4), and to quantify the importance of specific nodes within this network, several topological metrics were computed using the CytoNCA plugin, including Degree Centrality for identifying highly connected hubs, Betweenness Centrality for pinpointing bottleneck nodes that control communication flow between functional modules, Closeness Centrality for assessing the efficiency of information propagation from a specific protein, and Eigenvector Centrality for evaluating a node’s influence based on its neighbors’ connectivity. Furthermore, functional modules, representing densely connected protein complexes, were identified within the network using the MCODE algorithm. Finally, to validate the biological relevance of the observed network topology, comprehensive functional enrichment analyses were performed utilizing Gene Ontology (GO) for both biological processes and molecular functions, in conjunction with pathway analyses via the KEGG and Reactome databases, with statistical significance for enrichment being defined at an FDR (False Discovery Rate) of < 0.05.
Results
The analysis revealed that the honey bee stress response network has a highly organized, modular topology. The network is not a collection of random interactions but is instead structured into four distinct, yet interrelated, functional modules: (1) the Antioxidant/Redox Module, containing key enzymes like Sod1, Sod2, Trx-2, Gtpx2, and GstD1; (2) the Heat-Shock/Proteostasis Module, involving chaperones such as Hsp90 and Hsc70-4; (3) the Innate Immunity Module, comprising antimicrobial peptides and signaling components like Def1 and ABAE-APIME; and (4) the Metabolic-Hormonal Module, featuring regulatory proteins such as Akt1, Tor, and Vg. Topological metrics identified several critical hub genes that maintain the structural integrity of the network. Specifically, Sod1, Trx-2, and Sod2 exhibited the highest degree centrality (16) and were identified as the principal network hubs. Their high connectivity underscores the paramount importance of antioxidant enzymes in the honey bee’s defense against oxidative stress. Crucially, the analysis identified vitellogenin (Vg) as the most significant regulatory bridge in the entire network. While it did not have the highest degree, Vg exhibited an exceptionally high Betweenness Centrality of 80.4931, identifying it as a key bottleneck node. This high betweenness indicates that Vg is strategically positioned to mediate communication between the disparate functional modules (antioxidant, immune, and metabolic). In the Vg-centered subnetwork analysis, Vg exhibited Degree Centrality of 11 and Closeness Centrality of 1.0000, confirming its role as a highly accessible and central coordinator. The Vg subnetwork demonstrated direct protein-protein interactions with 11 unique neighbors, representing a cross-section of all four functional axes, thereby confirming its pleiotropic role in integrating stress-related signals. Functional enrichment results provided strong biological validation for these topological findings. GO Biological Process analysis was significantly enriched for terms such as cellular response to oxidative stress, response to heat, and regulation of metabolic processes. GO Molecular Function analysis highlighted antioxidant enzyme activity and chaperone-related functions. Furthermore, KEGG and Reactome pathway analyses identified significant enrichment in the Insulin/TOR signaling pathway and redox homeostasis pathways, highlighting the critical connection between energy metabolism (via Akt1 and Tor) and the stress response (via Vg).
Conclusions
This study provides a comprehensive systems-level view of the honey bee stress response, demonstrating that it is a highly coordinated, multi-modular process. The results indicate that the antioxidant defense system, led by hubs such as Sod1 and Sod2, forms the structural core of the network. At the same time, vitellogenin (Vg) serves as the essential physiological bridge integrating antioxidant, immune, and metabolic regulatory systems. The identification of Vg as a high-betweenness node suggests that it is a master regulator capable of synchronizing different defensive modules to ensure colony-wide resilience. These findings have significant implications for honey bee biology and management; specifically, Sod1, Sod2, and Vg represent high-priority candidate molecular markers for breeding programs aimed at developing more resilient bee lineages. However, it is important to note that our results are derived from a prediction-based PPI analysis. While the topological evidence is robust, future research must prioritize in vivo experimental validation to confirm the specific biochemical interactions and functional consequences of these hubs under diverse environmental stress conditions.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Antioxidant defense
  • Heat stress
  • Network centrality analysis
  • PPI network
  • Vitellogenin
Reference
Akinlaja, M., Stacey, G., & Foster, L. (2021). Characterizing the Honey Bee Interactome using Mass Spectrometry‐Based Proteomics.The FASEB Journal, 35. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2021.35.S1.02194
Alqarni, A. S., Ali, H., Iqbal, J., Owayss, A. A., & Smith, B. H. (2019). Expression of heat shock proteins in adult honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) workers under hot-arid subtropical ecosystems. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 26(7), 1372-1376. https://doi.org /10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.08.017
Amdam, G. V., & Omholt, S. W. (2003). The hive bee to forager transition in honeybee colonies: the double repressor hypothesis. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 223(4),451–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0022-5193(03) 00121-8
Amdam, G. V., Simões, Z. L. P., Hagen, A., Norberg, K., Schrøder, K., Mikkelsen, Ø., Kirkwood, T. B. L., & Omholt, S. W. (2004). Hormonal control of the yolk precursor vitellogenin regulates immune function and longevity in honeybees. Experimental Gerontology, 39(5), 767–773.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2004.02.010
Bader, G. D., & Hogue, C. W. (2003). An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC bioinformatics,4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-4-2
Balieira, K. V. B., Mazzo, M., Bizerra, P. F. V., Guimarães, A. R. D. J. S., Nicodemo, D., & Mingatto, F. E. (2018). Imidacloprid-induced oxidative stress in honey bees and the antioxidant action of caffeine. Apidologie, 49(5), 562-572. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s13592-018-0583-1
Barabási, A. L., & Oltvai, Z. N. (2004). Network biology: understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nrg1272
Bordier, C., Dechatre, H., Suchail, S., Peruzzi, M., Soubeyrand, S., Kremer, N., and Alaux, C. (2017). Colony adaptive response to simulated heat waves and consequences at the individual level in honeybees (Apis mellifera). Scientific Reports, 7: 3760. https://doi:10.1038/s 41598-017-03944-x.
Corona, M., & Robinson, G. E. (2006). Genes of the antioxidant system of the honey bee: annotation and phylogeny. Insect Molecular Biology, 15(5), 687–701. https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.0069 5.x
Corona, M., Velarde, R. A., Remolina, S., Moran-Lauter, A., Wang, Y., Hughes, K. A., & Robinson, G. E. (2007). Vitellogenin, juvenile hormone, insulin signaling, and queen honey bee longevity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(17), 7128–7133. https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.0701909104
Danihlík, J., Aronstein, K., & Petřivalský, M. (2015). Antimicrobial peptides: a key component of honey bee innate immunity. Journal of Apicultural Research, 54(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/0021 8839.2015. 1109919
Di Pasquale, G., Salignon, M., Le Conte, Y., Belzunces, L. P., Decourtye, A., Kretzschmar, A., & Alaux, C. (2013). Influence of pollen nutrition on honey bee health: do pollen quality and diversity matter?. PloS one, 8(8), e72016. https: //doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072016
Elekonich, M. M. (2009). Extreme thermotolerance and behavioral induction of 70-kDa heat shock proteins and their encoding genes in honey bees. Cell Stress and Chaperones, 14(5), 545–553. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s12192-009-0106-x
Evans, J. D., Aronstein, K., Chen, Y. P., Hetru, C., Imler, J. L., Jiang, H., Kanost, M., Thompson, G. J., Zou, Z., & Hultmark, D. (2006). Immune pathways and defence mechanisms in honey bees Apis mellifera. Insect Molecular Biology, 15(5), 645–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006. 00682.x
Felton, G. W., & Summers, C. B. (1995). Antioxidant systems in insects. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, 29(2), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/arch. 940290208
González-Tokman, D., Villada-Bedoya, S., Hernández, A., & Montoya, B. (2025). Antioxidants, oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species in insects exposed to heat. Current Research in Insect Science, 7, 100114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cris. 2025.100114
Goulson, D., Nicholls, E., Botías, C., & Rotheray, E. L. (2015). Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Science, 347(6229), 1255957. https://doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1255957
Hartwell, L. H., Hopfield, J. J., Leibler, S., & Murray, A. W. (1999). From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature, 402(Suppl),C47–C52. https://doi.org/10. 1038/35011540.
Havukainen, H., Münch, D., Baumann, A., Zhong, S., Halskau, Ø., Krogsgaard, M., & Amdam, G. V. (2013). Vitellogenin recognizes cell damage through membrane binding and shields living cells from reactive oxygen species. Journal of Biological Chemistry,288(39), 28369-28381.https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.465021
Hay, N. (2011). Interplay between FOXO, TOR, and Akt.Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Molecular Cell Research, 1813(11),1965-1970. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.03.013
Jeong, H., Mason, S. P., Barabási, A. L., & Oltvai, Z. N. (2001). Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature, 411(6833),41–42. https://doi.org/10.1038 /35075138
Klein, A. M., Vaissière, B. E., Cane, J. H., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Cunningham, S. A., Kremen, C., & Tscharntke, T. (2006). Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the royal society B: biological sciences, 274(1608),303. https://doi.org/10.1098/ rspb.2006.3721
Kodrík, D., Bednářová, A., Zemanová, M., & Krishnan, N. (2015). Hormonal regulation of response to oxidative stress in insectsan update. International journal of molecular sciences, 16(10), 25788-25816. https://doi. org/10.3390/ijms161025788
Margotta, J. W., Roberts, S. P., & Elekonich, M. M. (2018). Effects of flight activity and age on oxidative damage in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Journal of Experimental Biology, 221(14), jeb183228. https://doi. org/10.1242/jeb.183228
Nelson, C. M., Ihle, K. E., Fondrk, M. K., Page Jr, R. E., & Amdam, G. V. (2007). The gene vitellogenin has multiple coordinating effects on social organization.PLoS biology5(3), e62. https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pbio.0050062
Potts, S. G., Biesmeijer, J. C., Kremen, C., et al. (2010). Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25(6), 345-353. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007
Richter, K., Haslbeck, M., & Buchner, J. (2010). The heat shock response: life on the verge of death. Molecular cell, 40(2), 253-266.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.10.006 
Salmela, H., & Sundström, L. (2017). Vitellogenin in inflammation and immunity in social insects. Inflammation and Cell Signaling, 4, e1506. https://doi. org/10. 14800/ics.1506
Seehuus, S. C., Norberg, K., Gimsa, U., Krekling, T., & Amdam, G. V. (2006). Reproductive protein protects functionally sterile honey bee workers from oxidative stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(4), 962–967. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502681103
Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S., Wang, J. T., Ramage, D., Amin, N., Schwikowski, B., & Ideker, T. (2003). Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Research, 13(11), 2498–2504. https://doi.org/ 10.1101/gr.1239303
Szklarczyk, D., Kirsch, R., Koutrouli, M., Nastou, K., Mehryary, F., Hachilif, R., Gable, A. L., Fang, T., Doncheva, N. T., Pyysalo, S., Bork, P., Jensen, L. J., & von Mering, C. (2023). The STRING database in 2023: protein–protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest. Nucleic Acids Research, 51(D1), D638–D646. https://doi.org/10. 1093/nar /gkac1000
Tang, Y., Li, M., Wang, J., Pan, Y., & Wu, F. X. (2015). CytoNCA: a Cytoscape plugin for centrality analysis and evaluation of protein interaction networks. Biosystems, 127, 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. biosystems.2014.11.005
Wang, Y., Brent, C. S., Fennern, E., & Amdam, G. V. (2012). Gustatory perception and fat body energy metabolism are jointly affected by vitellogenin and juvenile hormone in honey bees. PLoS genetics,8(6), e1002779.
Yu, H., Kim, P. M., Sprecher, E., Trifonov, V., & Gerstein, M. (2007). The importance of bottlenecks in protein networks: correlation with gene essentiality and expression dynamics. PLoS Computational Biology, 3(4), e59. https://doi.org/10.1371 /journal.pcbi.0030059